The Irrelevant Good Faith Agreement II

This blog is written mostly tongue in cheek. Some points may be informative. Please provide your feedback.
If you suffer from self-irrelevancy, please seek professional advice.

Hello. Should the RCGA be upset Davis Love III is not at the Canadian Open? In any other year, Love would be just one of the many top ranked players who wouldn't come here to play. However, he received a huge sum to redesign Angus Glen North. The RCGA probably assumed Love would play this year. That assumption was irrelevant.
If Love did show this year, his appearance would be irrelvant. And since there's no rule saying PGA Tour pros have to play certain events, Love was within his rights to no show.
Would I have done it? No. But the RCGA should've made Love's appearance in the Canadian Open a condition for him to do the redesign. And if he didn't show, for any reason, Love should've had to have paid back a portion of his fee. $500,000 maybe would've gotten his attention.
Good faith agreements are irrelevant on the PGA Tour these days. Next time, RCGA, get it in writing.

Regards,
Irrelevant